60-367 Computer Networks   Fall 2014

 

Lecture Slides

Sample Tests

Group Labs

Research Essay

Requirements/Schedule

Marks

 

INSTRUCTOR ILLNESS – CLASS CANCELLATION Monday Oct. 20:

Due to a personal health matter Dr. Kent is currently recovering at home; hence, the class lecture scheduled for Monday Oct. 20th has been cancelled.  All students are advised that the scheduled Midterm Examination #1 for Wednesday Oct. 22nd, from 1:00pm to 2:20pm, is still scheduled.  All GA office hours are still effect and students are encouraged to see GA staff for assistance or evaluation of assigned laboratory work.

Regarding the Midterm Exam #1, students are advised that the material to be tested includes all material presented in the lectures to date, and all assigned readings from Chapters 1, 2 and 3, up to the introduction of UDP (also the last item covered in lectures).

 

Instructor:    Dr. Robert D. Kent

Office Hours:     Monday and Wednesday, 10:00am to 12:00noon   LT 5100

NOTE:   From time to time, office hours may be cancelled without notification. 
              Dr. Kent monitors his email regularly and students are encouraged to
              communicate with him through email.

GRADUATE ASSISTANTS:

 

GA

Days

Time

Email

Assignment Marking

David MacMillan      

Tuesday + Thursday

3:30pm-5:00pm

macmilld@uwindsor.ca

Assign/Lab:  2, 4, 6

Aditi Bhardwaj    

Wednesday / Friday

2:30pm-4:00pm / 3:00pm-4:30pm

bhard114@uwindsor.ca

Assign/Lab:  1, 3, 5

NOTE:  GA Office Hours listed above will be held in ER3150 (Java Lab).  All Group Lab exercises will be graded by GAs.  Students should contact them during office hours, or by email, to set up appointments for each Lab evaluation. 

Students should visit the GA noted above for marking assignment/labs according to number (see the table above).

 

 

Student Marks (Fall 2014):

 

When available: Click Here to see class marks, listed in ascending order by student ID number.

 

Sample Previous Examinations:

The following sample examination questions and solutions are intended as a study aid with a prepared bank of questions that students can use in learning.  It is a basis only and not intended to replace more authoritative sources, including the textbook, lecture and assigned practical work.

Fall 2013: FINAL EXAM.   Final Exam Solutions are posted (Click to view.)

Fall 2013: Midterm 1.   Midterm #1 Solutions are posted (Click to view.)

Fall 2013: Midterm 2.   Midterm #2 Solutions are posted (Click to view.)

Intersession 2008: Midterm 1.   Midterm #1 Solutions are posted (Click to view.)

Intersession 2008: Midterm 2.   Midterm #2 Solutions are posted (Click to view.)

Intersession 2008: Final.   Final Exam Solutions are posted (Click to view.)

IMPORTANT NOTE:  The sample examinations and answers provided may contain some errors.  Students are advised to use these examples carefully as aids to studying the text and lecture notes.  It is best to be extra cautious and distrust every answer provided until you have independently verified the actual answer using the textbook and other reliable, trustworthy sources.

 

Course Requirements and Schedule:

 

 

Component

Date

Location

Weight

Midterm Exam #1

Wed, Oct 22, 1:00pm to 2:15pm

Toldo 104 (regular classroom)

15%

Midterm Exam #2

Wed, Nov 19, 1:00pm to 2:15pm

Toldo 104 (regular classroom)

15%

Research Essay

Friday, Nov 21 (23:59:59)

Email submission to rkent@uwindsor.ca 

10%

Group Labs

TBA

Presentation - By appointment with GA

20%

Final Exam

Friday, Dec 12, 12:00 Noon

TBA

40%

 

 

Course Outline:   Click here to download Word (docx) file.

 

Course Group Laboratory Assignments:  

 

The Group Lab Exercises for this course are aimed at practical application.  Students will form groups of 1-3 students each.  Each group will work to achieve all aspects of a set of problems that are described in each lab assignment file.  These problems will involve working with standard networking software tools, and may also require programming work for which the Java language (and packages) or Python will be suitable.  The project work should be completed by the stated due dates/weeks and arrangements made with the GA to present the work in sessions that must be accompanied by all students in the group.  Student marks for each group lab exercise are assigned on a group basis with the same mark assigned to each student in a group, unless the marker determines that significant differences exist in individual student comprehension and technical knowledge.

 

Assignment/Lab Number

Group Lab Exercise

Due date

Lab Exercise Files (.DOC for download)

1

Introduction to Wireshark

Week 5

Wireshark_Intro_v6.0.doc

2

TCP and UDP

Week 6

Wireshark_TCP_v6.0.doc

Wireshark_UDP_v6.1.doc

3

HTTP and NAT

Week 7

Wireshark_HTTP_v6.1.doc

Wireshark_NAT_v6.0.doc

4

ICMP and IP

Week 8

Wireshark_ICMP_v6.0.doc

Wireshark_IP_v6.0.doc

5

Ethernet

Week 9

Wireshark_Ethernet_ARP_v6.01.doc

6

802.11 and SSL

Week 10

Wireshark_802.11_v6.0.doc

Wireshark_SSL_v6.0.doc

 

Labs below are optional and supplied for the interested students.

 

 

 

DHCP and DNS

Optional

Wireshark_DHCP_v6.0.doc Wireshark_DNS_v6.01.doc

 

 

Evaluation:

Each lab exercise will be evaluated out of 5 marks, with 3 marks allocated to the entire group, and 2 marks allocated to each individual student within a group.  Evaluation is based on objective measures, including achieving correct and complete answers to questions and activities posed within each exercise and also posed during the evaluation interview with GA teaching staff.

 

The GAs will follow the procedures outlined below, provided as a guide to students:

(A) Group Mark (out of 3)

   3 - Group has completed most of the lab work and has provided answers to most (at least 80%) of the questions stated in the lab.  Very few mistakes are made.

   2 - Group has completed parts of the lab work in entirety, but is missing some portions of the work;  the group has provided answers to some of the questions (at least 65%) but not all.  Some mistakes are made but the majority of work is sound.

   1 - Group has completed only a small part of the lab work and has provided only some answers to a subset of questions asked (at least 35%).  Several mistakes are made.

   0 - Group has done very little or no work, has not provided answers to questions, mistakes are common.

 

(B) Individual Mark (out of 2)

   2 - The individual student is able to answer correctly the majority of questions asked during the evaluation meeting

   1 - The individual student is able to answer correctly at least one-half of the questions asked during the evaluation meeting.

   0 - The individual student is not able to answer questions completely or accurately and reflects a lack of understanding of theory and/or practice.

 

Course Research Essay:   Click Here – Research Essay.

 

The essay for this course is aimed at research.  The student is required to research an advanced topic from a list provided by the instructor during the first week of lectures, write a detailed report, and submit the report in Word or OpenOffice compatible file formats to the instructor – note that PDF files are NOT acceptable.  Each student must work independently and the mark for the research essay is assigned on an individual basis.  The due date and time are Saturday, June 13 (23:59:59).  Plagiarism is absolutely forbidden and will result in a mark of zero (0).  Failure to properly use and cite references will result in significant penalties.

 

·      All essays will be marked by Dr. Kent.  The following brief description of evaluation is intended as a guide to students.

o      Marks of 9-10.    Student did excellent work, well organized, good spelling and grammar, narrowed topic coverage with details, definitions of all terms used, proper use of references and citations.

o      Marks of 7-8.5.   Student did good work, lacking in one or more of: organization, spelling and grammar, too broad a topic coverage, lacking details, definitions of terms used, inadequate or insufficient use of references.

o      Marks of 5-6.5.   Student did adequate work, but lacked organization, details, definitions, insufficient references, typically too high level and historical rather than a technical essay.

o      Marks of 0-4.9    Student did not engage the work in a manner that leads to understanding, lacked organization, details, definitions, insufficient references, typically too high level and historical, rather than a technical essay, confused statements and illogical conclusions.

 


 

Required Textbook:

 

Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach (6’th Edition).  J. F. Kurose and K. W. Ross.

(NOTE: Students may use previous editions, but all lecture and website references are to the 6th edition.)

 

Lecture Schedule:

 

Following is a list of lecture slides taken from the publisher website (Pearson-Addison-Wesley) and are mirrored on this website.  Note the topics, chapters from the textbook and the slides.  Students are advised that lecture slides are not a substitute for the lectures and the assigned readings from the textbook.  Examination questions and Project will require deeper understanding that can only be gained by additional textbook reading as assigned.

 

Students will be examined on assigned reading materials from the textbook and on the details covered in the lectures based on the posted slides and textbook.

 

 

Week

Topics and Lecture Notes (Kurose/Ross)

Week 1-2

Topics: Introduction and Service Models, Network Management

Lecture notes: Introduction, general concepts, infrastructure - Chapter 1

 

Week 3-4

Topics: Physical Layer Issues, Data Link Layer Issues

Lecture notes: Application Layer - Chapter 2

 

Week 5-6

Topics: Data Link Layer Issues:ATM, Addressing, Subnetting, ICMP

Lecture notes: Transport Layer – Chapter 3

 

Week 7-8

Topics: Network Layer Issues: Switches and Routers, Distance Vector Routing (RIP), Link State Routing (OSPF)

Lecture notes: Network Layer – Chapter 4

 

 

Week 9-10

Topics: Transport Layer Issues: Connectionless Service (UDP), Connection-Oriented Service (TCP)

Lecture notes: Link Layer and LANS – Chapter 5

 

Week 11-12

Topics: Network Security, Messaging & Delivery, (Grid Computing – time permitting)

Lecture notes: Network Security – Chapter 8

 

Topics:  Advanced chapter coverage (time depending)

 

Lecture notes: Wireless and Mobile Networks – Chapter 6

Lecture notes: Multimedia Networking – Chapter 7

Lecture notes: Network Management – Chapter 9

 

 

 

Policy on cheating:

The professor and teaching assistants for 60-367 will put a great deal of effort into helping students to understand and to learn the material in the course.  However, they will not tolerate any form of cheating.

 

The professors and teaching assistants will report any case of cheating to the Director of the School of Computer Science.  If sufficient evidence is available, the Director will begin a formal process according to the University Senate Bylaws.  The instructor will not negotiate with students who are accused of cheating but will pass all information to the Director of the School of Computer Science.

 

The following behaviours will be regarded as cheating (together with other acts that would normally be regarded as cheating in the broad sense of the term):

 


·         Copying assignments

·         Allowing another student to copy an assignment from you and present it as their own work

·         Copying from another student during a test or exam

·         Referring to notes, textbooks, etc. during a test or exam

·         Talking during a test or an exam

·         Not sitting at the pre-assigned seat during a test or exam

·         Communicating with another student in any way during a test or exam

·         Having access to the exam/test paper prior to the exam/test

·         Asking a proctor for the answer to a question during an exam/test

·         Presenting another person’s work as your own

·         Using web resources and information without proper referencing and quotation indicators

·         Modifying answers after they have been marked

·         Any other behaviour which attempts unfairly to give you an advantage over other students in the grade-assessment process

·         Refusing to obey the instructions of the officer in charge of an examination.


 

Copyright 2014.  Dr. Robert D. Kent.  All rights reserved.  All content on this website is the responsibility of R. D. Kent.  Report all errors and problems to Dr. Kent.